Obamarama: Unstoppable Obama

February 20, 2008

Ok, so I really, really don’t like to count my chickens before they are hatched.  Things happen, even with nine wins in a row.  Nonetheless, here’s what Barbara Ehrenreich has to say:

Unstoppable Obama
by Barbara Ehrenreich

This article can be found on the web at:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080303/ehrenreich
When did you begin to think that Obama might be unstoppable? Was it
when your grown feminist daughter started weeping inconsolably over his
defeat in New Hampshire? Or was it when he triumphed in Virginia, a
state still littered with Confederate monuments and memorabilia? For me,
it was on Tuesday night when two Republican Virginians in a row called
CSPAN radio to report that they’d just voted for Ron Paul, but, in the
general election, would vote for… Obama.

In the dominant campaign narrative, his appeal is mysterious and
irrational: he’s a “rock star,” all flash and no substance, tending
dangerously, according to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, to a “cult of personality.” At best, he’s seen as another vague Reaganesque avatar
to Hallmarkian sentiments like optimism and hope. While Clinton, the
designated valedictorian, reaches out for the ego and super-ego, he
supposedly goes for the id. She might as well be promoting choral
singing in the face of Beatlemania.

The Clinton coterie is wringing its hands. Should she transform herself
into an economic populist, as Paul Begala pleaded on Tuesday night? This
would be a stretch, given her technocratic and elitist approach to
health reform in 1993, her embarrassing vote for a 2001 bankruptcy bill
supported by credit card companies, among numerous other lapses.
Besides, Obama already just leaped out in front of her with a resoundingly
populist economic program on Wednesday.

Or should she reconfigure herself, untangle her triangulations, and
attempt to appeal to the American people in some deep human way, with or
without a tear or two? This, too, would take heavy lifting. Someone
needs to tell her that there are better ways to signal conviction than
by raising one’s voice and drawing out the vowels, as in “I KNOW…”
and “I BELIEVE…” The frozen smile has to go too, along with the
metronymic nodding, which sometimes goes on long enough to suggest a
placement within the autism spectrum.

But I don’t think any tweakings of the candidate or her message will
work, and not because Obama-mania is an occult force or a kind of mass
hysteria. Let’s take seriously what he offers, which is “change.” The
promise of “change” is what drives the Obama juggernaut, and “change”
means wanting out of wherever you are now. It can even mean wanting out
so badly that you don’t much care, as in the case of the Ron Paul voters
cited above, exactly what that change will be. In reality, there’s no
mystery about the direction in which Obama might take us: he’s written a
breathtakingly honest autobiography; he has a long legislative history,
and now, a meaty economic program. But no one checks the weather before
leaping out of a burning building.

Consider our present situation. Thanks to Iraq and water-boarding, Abu
Ghraib and the “rendering” of terror suspects, we’ve achieved the moral
status of a pariah nation. The seas are rising. The dollar is sinking. A
growing proportion of Americans have no access to health care; an
estimated 18,000 die every year for lack of health insurance. Now, as
the economy staggers into recession, the financial analysts are
wondering only whether the rest of the world is sufficiently
“de-coupled” from the US economy to survive our demise.

Clinton can put forth all the policy proposals she likes–and many
of them are admirable ones–but anyone can see that she’s of the same
generation and even one of the same families that got us into this
checkmate situation in the first place. True, some people miss Bill,
although the nostalgia was severely undercut by his anti-Obama rhetoric
in South Carolina, or maybe they just miss the Internet bubble he
happened to preside over. But even more people find dynastic successions
distasteful, especially when it’s a dynasty that produced so little by
way of concrete improvements in our lives. Whatever she does, the
semiotics of her campaign boils down to two words–“same old.”

Obama is different, really different, and that in itself represents
“change.” A Kenyan-Kansan with roots in Indonesia and multiracial
Hawaii, he seems to be the perfect answer to the bumper sticker that
says, “I love you America, but isn’t it time to start seeing other
people?” As conservative commentator Andrew Sullivan has written,
Obama’s election could mean the re-branding of America. An antiwar black
President with an Arab-sounding name: See, we’re not so bad after all,
world!

So yes, there’s a powerful emotional component to Obama-mania, and
not just because he’s a far more inspiring speaker than his rival. We,
perhaps white people especially, look to him for atonement and
redemption. All of us, of whatever race, want a fresh start. That’s what
“change” means right now: Get us out of here!

Visit The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: